September 12, 2017
Writers: Steven Kampmann
Director: Rod Daniel
Original Air Date: January 10, 1981
This is Steven Kampmann's first script since "Hotel Oceanview" and it shares that episode's clockwork- like story structure. It is so complex, I created a chart to follow the money and the ownership of the painting...
In fact, I can't quite tell if Mr. Carlson ever actually gave Herb any money for the painting, and/or if so, if Herb paid it back. Even if the accounting is a little off, the passing of money is little more than the slamming doors in a French bedroom farce. The doors don't matter; it's all about the people showing their true faces.
We've always known Herb's true face. It's his only face! He's a hustler, whether hustling Carlson for favour by showing up at a church auction he has no interest in, or trying to cut Les out of a deal to make big money from the painting. Herb fancies himself "a shrewd businessman" while admitting "when have you ever known any of my schemes to work out?"
What is more interesting is Bailey. Throughout the entire episode, she holds herself in higher moral standing to Herb because she acts as the only true lover of the art for the art's sake. But when Herb's price jumps up to $500, she is willing to sell. Herb even calls her out on this, saying "Deep down inside you're just a shrewd businessman like me." Bailey protests by saying she doesn't hold Herb's belief that everything has a price. But Bailey is the one who sold the painting! She proves Herb's point, AND demands the tax deductable receipt while doing so! The episode ends with Bailey gazing lovingly at the painting, but we've already seen that she has a price.
Les is also a lot more like Herb. He originally intended to go to the auction with Herb for the same reason - to curry favour with the Big Guy. And he might get guilted into visiting his mother and paying Herb $50. But in the end, he uses Herb's own cheque to suck up to Carlson, all while smirking at his "best friend."
I brought up Kampmann because this is a very "writterly" episode, with call backs and repeated phrases used one on top of the other to building comedic effect. Whether any real people would ever speak like that is another matter.
Here are some of the phrases Herb uses over and over:
- planning on taking the family to Milwaukee/Oklahoma City
- were you there when... ?
- that's just a word people use...
- no lectures
It really only gains some traction when Bailey repeats these phrases back to him, especially the very well timed "so's your mother." By repeating Herb back, it shows us that she has been learning from him this whole time. Again, she is more of the "shrewd businessman" than she would want to admit to herself.
There is one scene that seems like it may have been written by somebody else, because it doesn't follow along with the clockwork symmetry of the main story and that's the scene in Andy's office in which Bailey shows off the painting. Can we all admit here that this is a terrible painting? Maybe not terrible, but stodgy and old-fashioned and certainly not the sort of item a young, college educated woman would literally swoon over. It looks like it could be hanging in a hotel hallway.
Andy likes the frame. Maybe he could use it to frame his bumper sticker collection. Venus exaggerates his poses before proclaiming it "nice." Johnny's rants on how he doesn't like it. But the boys all come to Bailey's defense when Herb threatens to take back the painting. I've always loved the line "How about the four of us pounding you to dust?" No one backs down from the threat - there is solidarity. Someday I'll work it into a conversation.
By the conclusion. Herb was right and his scheme doesn't work, but he's only out the amount he spent on the painting anyhow and Bailey get the painting she desperately wanted. It's a "Midsummer Night in Cincinnati."
Roy
Other Notes: Steven Kampmann might be best known for the two season he played the character of Kirk Devane on "Newhart."
Thanks for this analysis of "The Painting". To be honest, this was always my least favorite episode in the whole series. I just always found it so dry and wordy. But after reading your article, I have a better appreciation for it. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks Gary. I hope you get a chance to read some of the other posts as well. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
DeleteRoy
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHi, Roy. Just discovered your blog. WKRP was one of those shows I watched in syndicated reruns as a kid, and just recently I've come back to it. While doing some light Googling about the show, I quickly found your blog and have been making my way through some of your older reviews. I'm enjoying it -- both the blog and the series. You're a much tougher critic of WKRP than I am, though, really scrutinizing the logic and verisimilitude of the show. I've mostly just been enjoying it as a funny, light ensemble show in an interesting workplace setting. Also, I just kind of jumped into the middle of season two, so I'm kind of rewatching the show haphazardly instead of going back to the beginning and watching it in order. Anyway, this is a neat project, and I hope you keep it going.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, great use of the word "verisimilitude"! Thank you for reading the blog. I really enjoyed your comments. I don't get to write as regularly as I would like, but I fully intend on finishing up the series. I'd love to hear your thoughts on some of the other entries.
DeleteGood day, and May the Good News Be Yours!
Roy
As someone who grew up collecting comic books in their most random 'now you see me/ now you don't' periodical manner, collecting back issues in whatever order I could afford, I'm a big fan of 'haphazard watching.' I'm more of a syndicated viewer myself, though I don't think I truly understood it as a kid. It still has a level that works if you're a kid, at that time, anyway. I think it clicks just fine at the 'light ensemble, interesting workplace' level- let's face it, while it was on the air, that was its main appeal. They can be wonderful at social commentary, but some of the best of that is portrayed in passing dialogue.
DeleteI'm looking at the logic from a 'writerly' POV, and appreciate this analysis, Roy. I'm just very wrapped up in the show and open to learning!
>>>There is one scene that seems like it may have been written >>>by somebody else, because it doesn't follow along with the >>>clockwork symmetry of the main story and that's the scene in >>>Andy's office in which Bailey shows off the painting. Can we >>>all admit here that this is a terrible painting?
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely in my all-time top ten KRPs (I'm in the minority in believing "Turkeys" is only good, not great). One thing that might have improved this one even more . . . is if we never -see- the painting.
I'm just catching up on the DVDs now, and I caught something that ties that scene in Andy's office into the rest of the episode.
ReplyDeleteAfter Venus makes the "dust" threat, Herb echoes Les' "you do that, and I'll see you in court." To which Venus casually says, "we don't care."
You're right about it being "writerly," but it works for me.